The Super Bowl is played in a matter of hours. The residents of BC have been fighting to have their voices heard by the Joint Review Panel for many months.
Some wonderful person tallied the results from the JRP community presentations and we're pleased to announce a winner - of the 1161 people who made it through the complicated process to speak, only two spoke in favour of the Enbridge proposal.
Thanks to all the people who did speak - your stories and understanding and knowledge - your hearts are on record.
Bravo!
Say the Names brings stories from the people who live in the towns and travel the rivers and lakes situated along the proposed route of the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline project in British Columbia.
Say the Names...
Al Purdy wrote a wonderful poem called "Say the names say the names" which celebrates the names of Canadian rivers - Tulameen, Kleena Kleene, Similkameen, Nahanni, Kluane and on and on in a celebratory song.
Enbridge is planning to build a dual pipeline that will carry bitumen and condensate across hundreds of waterways between Edmonton and Kitimat. Some of these waterways are rivers like the Parsnip (or what's left of it), the Nechako, the Morice and others are smaller creeks whose names are often known only to the folks who live along their banks or who fish in their shadows or who bend to wash or drink as they cross paths.
I want to collect the names of these rivers and creeks, to collect your stories, your poems, your songs so we can collectively give voice to the land living under the line Enbridge plans to draw.
People have also sent me copies of their presentations to the community oral presentations. If you'd like to add your voice, email me (sheila.peters900@gmail.com) your stories and I'll post them for you. The copyright remains with you.
All the best.
Sheila Peters
Enbridge is planning to build a dual pipeline that will carry bitumen and condensate across hundreds of waterways between Edmonton and Kitimat. Some of these waterways are rivers like the Parsnip (or what's left of it), the Nechako, the Morice and others are smaller creeks whose names are often known only to the folks who live along their banks or who fish in their shadows or who bend to wash or drink as they cross paths.
I want to collect the names of these rivers and creeks, to collect your stories, your poems, your songs so we can collectively give voice to the land living under the line Enbridge plans to draw.
People have also sent me copies of their presentations to the community oral presentations. If you'd like to add your voice, email me (sheila.peters900@gmail.com) your stories and I'll post them for you. The copyright remains with you.
All the best.
Sheila Peters
Showing posts with label northern gateway joint review panel hearings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label northern gateway joint review panel hearings. Show all posts
Monday, February 4, 2013
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Meet 'Dil Bit': The Enbridge Testimony Stephen Harper Doesn’t Want Heard
by Miranda Holmes
Many voices have been heard during these hearings, yet one has remained silent: the oily character at the centre of the debate. I think that’s a shame and so I am using my time before the panel to allow this character’s case to be made.Hi, my name’s Dil Bit. That’s short for Diluted Bitumen, but I feel like I’m amongst friends here, so let’s not be too formal.
I come from the tar sands and, as you know, Alberta totally digs me. Alberta’s so generous she wants to share me with everyone.
If she gets her way, I’ll be passing through British Columbia a lot in the future, so I thought I should introduce myself properly.
As fossil fuels go, I’m a bit unconventional. But, as Alberta’s favourite son Steve will tell you, I’m totally ethical. (And don’t let those jet setting celebrities tell you any different.)
I’m also way better than conventional crude oil.
For instance, my total acid concentrations are up to 20 times higher than conventional crude. My sulphur content is up to 10 times higher and I’m up to 70 times thicker. Pretty impressive, eh?
Yeah, it’s true I can be a bit abrasive. Bits of quartz, pyrite, silicates, sure I carry them around. It’s just the way I’m made.
So conventional crude doesn’t have my grit. So what? No need to point out, like those granola eaters at the Natural Resources Defense Council did, that putting me in a pipeline is “like sandblasting the inside of the pipe.”
I don’t know why the Americans have taken against me, because – like so many of them – I pack some serious heat. Thanks to my true grit and my thickness (I like to think of it as strength), I make pipes hotter than conventional crude - and harder to monitor. In fact, pipelines carrying me are16 times more likely to leak.
See? I told you I was better.
I’m Alberta’s most precious resource. You think she and Steve are going to let just anyone transport me? No way.
For my travels through British Columbia, they’re going to use Enbridge, a fine, upstanding company with an excellent track record. Why, it took Enbridge 10 years to spill half as much oil as the Exxon Valdez. And they didn’t just spill it in one spot – they spread it around.
Regulators in the US thought the three million litres of me Enbridge spilled in Michigan was so funny they compared the company to those great comedy characters the Keystone Kops.
If Enbridge maintains its current success rate it should be able to meet Steve’s federal standards, which allow undetected pipeline leaks of less than 2% of capacity per week.
For the Northern Gateway project that means Enbridge could legally leave 11 million litres of me a week behind on my way to Kitimat without getting into any serious trouble. And why should they? Eleven million litres of me would be more than three times funnier than Michigan, right?
That’s good news for me, because I’ve heard there are some mighty pretty places in northern BC and I think it would be a shame not to get to know them better.
And it’s good news for BC, because your premier’s promising lots of jobs out of oil and gas exports, and cleaning up after me will sure keep people employed.
Sorry if any of the spots I’m going to wreck is one of your favourites, but I’ve got to keep Alberta happy. You know what she’s like.
Miranda Holmes is a former journalist who spent a decade working on toxics and genetic engineering for Greenpeace and other environmental organizations in Canada and the UK. She has also worked on human rights and development issues. She is now an associate editor of the award-winning Watershed Sentinel magazine. She made this presentation to the JRP in August in Comox.
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Job creation
I was on a recent kayaking trip to Nuchatlitz Provincial Park on the west coast of Vancouver Island. We stocked up on groceries in Campbell River and I was wearing my "I've got this sinking feeling" T-shirt. (If anyone knows who designed this great shirt, please let me know because I'd like to credit them here.)
Two people in the grocery store came up to me (separately) and said they liked the T-shirt. One woman said she didn't like the project, but thought it was a done deal. Don't worry, I said. It's not going to happen. Keep speaking up. The other woman said she'd be going/coming up there/here (north) if she was needed. Later on, another couple told me the same thing.
Meanwhile the technical hearings are taking place right now - you can find summaries at the Northwest Institute website.
Now even though I've probably read too many John LeCarre novels where the lengths to which industry and government will go to protect economic interests is always nerve-wracking, I was more than a little creeped (to use a word my kids used to employ) to read an article in The Guardian Weekly: Shell spending $1 bn on security. It details the extent to which oil companies will go to maintain an unwelcome and environmentally destructive infrastructure. The article begins: "Shell is paying Nigerian security forces tens of millions of dollars a year to guard their installations and staff in the Niger delta....The oil giant also maintains a 1,200-strong internal police fore in Nigeria, plus a network of informants." Its budget for security in Africa, the article says, is number three after the total security budgets of the countries of South Africa and Nigeria.
I guess that's one way oil creates jobs.
Another perhaps unexpected job creation project that can likely be credited to the oil industry right here in Canada comes from the establishment of Alberta's counterterrorism unit. According to a June 6 Globe & Mail article, "After labelling certain environmental and first nations groups as extremists and radicals, Canada’s federal government, along with the country’s top law enforcement and spy agencies, have set up a counterterrorism unit in Alberta in order to protect the province’s natural resources and infrastructure."
The job spinoffs are amazing.
Just as it would be nice if some of Shell's security money went into addressing the environmental devastation its oil projects have caused in Nigeria, it would be nice if the Canadian government kept funding those scientists studying the effects of climate change and created jobs in alternative energy. The folks we stayed with in Nuchatliz rely almost entirely on solar - and that's on the wet coast. Go figure.
Two people in the grocery store came up to me (separately) and said they liked the T-shirt. One woman said she didn't like the project, but thought it was a done deal. Don't worry, I said. It's not going to happen. Keep speaking up. The other woman said she'd be going/coming up there/here (north) if she was needed. Later on, another couple told me the same thing.
Meanwhile the technical hearings are taking place right now - you can find summaries at the Northwest Institute website.
Now even though I've probably read too many John LeCarre novels where the lengths to which industry and government will go to protect economic interests is always nerve-wracking, I was more than a little creeped (to use a word my kids used to employ) to read an article in The Guardian Weekly: Shell spending $1 bn on security. It details the extent to which oil companies will go to maintain an unwelcome and environmentally destructive infrastructure. The article begins: "Shell is paying Nigerian security forces tens of millions of dollars a year to guard their installations and staff in the Niger delta....The oil giant also maintains a 1,200-strong internal police fore in Nigeria, plus a network of informants." Its budget for security in Africa, the article says, is number three after the total security budgets of the countries of South Africa and Nigeria.
I guess that's one way oil creates jobs.
Another perhaps unexpected job creation project that can likely be credited to the oil industry right here in Canada comes from the establishment of Alberta's counterterrorism unit. According to a June 6 Globe & Mail article, "After labelling certain environmental and first nations groups as extremists and radicals, Canada’s federal government, along with the country’s top law enforcement and spy agencies, have set up a counterterrorism unit in Alberta in order to protect the province’s natural resources and infrastructure."
The job spinoffs are amazing.
Just as it would be nice if some of Shell's security money went into addressing the environmental devastation its oil projects have caused in Nigeria, it would be nice if the Canadian government kept funding those scientists studying the effects of climate change and created jobs in alternative energy. The folks we stayed with in Nuchatliz rely almost entirely on solar - and that's on the wet coast. Go figure.
Monday, July 23, 2012
Kootenays to Kitimat Caravan
Bill Metcalfe sent me a link to a story he wrote for The Nelson Daily: Keep an eye out for these folks - last I heard they were in Fort St. James for the JRP hearings there:
About 40 Nelson residents gathered outside Nelson City Hall at noon today to support the four-person Kootenays to Kitimat Caravan, which left immediately after the rally for stops in Castlegar, Grand Forks, and points north. The caravan is travelling in opposition to the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline.
“We are here to say three simple things,” Keith Wiley, one of the caravaners, said at the mic. “No pipeline. No tankers. No problem."
"The massive opposition to this project is a turning point for Canada and Canadians," Wiley said. He and the other caravaners, all men who are no longer young, were affectionately dubbed "The Geezer Brigade" at the rally.
The half-hour event moved along briskly, with a few short speeches and an upbeat but determined mood. Local politicians from federal, provincial, and municipal governments attended and spoke.
To read the rest of the story...
About 40 Nelson residents gathered outside Nelson City Hall at noon today to support the four-person Kootenays to Kitimat Caravan, which left immediately after the rally for stops in Castlegar, Grand Forks, and points north. The caravan is travelling in opposition to the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline.
“We are here to say three simple things,” Keith Wiley, one of the caravaners, said at the mic. “No pipeline. No tankers. No problem."
"The massive opposition to this project is a turning point for Canada and Canadians," Wiley said. He and the other caravaners, all men who are no longer young, were affectionately dubbed "The Geezer Brigade" at the rally.
The half-hour event moved along briskly, with a few short speeches and an upbeat but determined mood. Local politicians from federal, provincial, and municipal governments attended and spoke.
To read the rest of the story...
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
JRP Oral Presentation Summaries
If you haven't found the time to read through all the oral presentations to the Joint Review Panel, Friends of Wild Salmon has posted summaries and photos of the presenters from all the sessions to date (and will keep adding them as they take place). JRP Oral Presentation Summaries. In the over 800 presentations made to date, only one person has said the risks associated with the proposal are ones we should take.
Monday, July 9, 2012
Cowboys and Indians
What a fiasco. It seems like the Calgary cowboys of the Joint Review Panel or their minders are afraid of the Indians. They've just announced that they're moving the Hazelton hearings to Smithers ( See Opinion 250). The only other community where hearings were delayed because of security issues was in Bella Bella. You'd think the Ontario member, Hans Matthews, a member of the Wahnapitae First Nation, would be able to reassure them on these matters.
In the meantime, people of all shapes, sizes, and colours have continued to line up across the northwest to voice their opposition to the pipeline proposal. In Prince George today hundreds of people gathered to demonstrate their feelings and former Smithers resident Kelly Giesbrecht made a powerful presentation - I've copied it in below:
Good afternoon,
Thank you for the opportunity to speak today.
I have just a brief statement for the record.
I am a Canadian citizen and lifetime resident of Northern BC, originally from Smithers and living in Prince George since 1996.
I am here today as I cannot rely on either my current elected officials, or my current provincial or federal governments to represent, or even consider, my views and opinions on this matter.
I oppose the development of this pipeline.
I am deeply concerned about the irreversible, negative impacts it will have on Northern BC's economy, environment, lifestyles and cultures, as well as on Canada's international reputation and credibility.
This pipeline is not in the public interest and does not contribute to national security - quite the opposite. This pipeline is an embarrassing proposition. It is unnecessary and unwanted.
There is a better way forward.
Thank you.
Way to go, Kelly!
In the meantime, people of all shapes, sizes, and colours have continued to line up across the northwest to voice their opposition to the pipeline proposal. In Prince George today hundreds of people gathered to demonstrate their feelings and former Smithers resident Kelly Giesbrecht made a powerful presentation - I've copied it in below:
Good afternoon,
Thank you for the opportunity to speak today.
I have just a brief statement for the record.
I am a Canadian citizen and lifetime resident of Northern BC, originally from Smithers and living in Prince George since 1996.
I am here today as I cannot rely on either my current elected officials, or my current provincial or federal governments to represent, or even consider, my views and opinions on this matter.
I oppose the development of this pipeline.
I am deeply concerned about the irreversible, negative impacts it will have on Northern BC's economy, environment, lifestyles and cultures, as well as on Canada's international reputation and credibility.
This pipeline is not in the public interest and does not contribute to national security - quite the opposite. This pipeline is an embarrassing proposition. It is unnecessary and unwanted.
There is a better way forward.
Thank you.
Way to go, Kelly!
Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Steelhead on their upstream journey in Canyon Creek
Francois Depey sent this story and photo - thanks Francois.
Saturday, June 16,
2012
I like waterfalls!
So, I check them around, once in a while.
We went to the lower fall at Canyon Creek, a tributary of
the Bulkley River.
The water drop is located only 9 Km as crow flies, from the
mouth of Canyon Creek (at the Bulkley River), a bit of a longer distance “as
water flows” or “fish swims”…
What a pleasant surprise to see those fish jumping to make their
way upstream. Since I am not a fish
expert nor a fisher at all, I was spoiled to be there with a fish specialist
who could right away identify those fish as steelheads.
I learnt that steelheads spend one winter in the Bulkley
before heading up to smaller tributaries when the water level is right for them
to swim up. It is a matter of
timing. They don’t have to fight the
strong current of the Bulkley in springtime.
The fact that they spend the winter months in the river means that if an
oil spill would occur at that time or in early spring, they would be a prime target.
Unlike salmon, steelhead do the round trip from their spawning
grounds to the ocean up to four times (or maybe more!?) in their lifetime. That is an exciting nomadic life, I guess.
Watching them fighting their way to their spawning ground in
Canyon Creek is not a sight I would be prepared to sacrifice for all the
oil/tar sand in the world!
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
The harlequin ducks are back on Driftwood Creek
We've been out looking for a couple of weeks now, wandering the edges of the creek, noting the rise and fall of the water, the muddy and nutrient foam tricking our eyes into seeing ducks bobbing in the back eddies.
This morning, just across from a small viewing platform in Driftwood Canyon Provincial Park, we saw the usual three: two males and a female. We stood high up on one bank of the creek; they hopped up onto rocks on the other side and we all had a good look at each other.
There's a fascinating Species at Risk Study that outlines their use of creeks for breeding - they tend to form long-term bonds and the females will take up to four years to reach reproductive maturity. Having clear, fast-flowing streams seems to be essential to their survival because they feed on the "invertebrates in the substrate" - i.e. all the little creatures wriggling around in creek gravel. Dippers eat from the same table.
If you've read my submission to the Joint Review Panel (see Tuesday, April 24 - Congratulations to our community), you'll know why seeing these ducks this morning, and a dipper two days ago, has such significance.They are markers of the ways in which home is both one specific and familiar place and also connected to the greater world in ways we barely comprehend.
Monday, May 7, 2012
Terrace hearings begin this evening
The oral statements begin this evening in Terrace - I encourage anyone who can to check them out - the statements in Smithers proved to be powerfully unifying for all of us concerned about this project.
Transcripts are available (see link on right), plus you can listen in. Bravo to all of you who have signed up and don't forget - you can still make a written presentation.
Order of Appearances for Oral Statements
Terrace, 7 May 2012 7:00pm – 9:00pm
􀂾 Ken Beddie
􀂾 Patrick Butler
􀂾 Christopher Gee
􀂾 Inke Giannelia
􀂾 Aaron J. GreyCloud
􀂾 Anne Hill
􀂾 Greer Kaiser
􀂾 Jupiter MacDonald
􀂾 Roderick Bruce Meredith
􀂾 Terry Walker
Terrace, 8 May 2012 9:00am – 12:00pm
􀂾 Robin Austin
􀂾 Matthew Beedle
􀂾 Frances Birdsell
􀂾 Rob Brown
􀂾 Amanita Coosemans
􀂾 Jim Culp
􀂾 Ian Gordon
􀂾 Bessie Haizimsqu
􀂾 John How
􀂾 John Jensen
􀂾 Mikael Jensen
􀂾 Brian Kean
􀂾 Amy Klepetar
􀂾 Lori Merrill
􀂾 Andrena Moore
􀂾 Dustin Quezada
􀂾 Laszlo Ratkai
􀂾 Sheree Ronasen
􀂾 Roberta (Boby) Wagner
􀂾 Allen Wootton
Terrace, 8 May 2012 1:00pm – 5:30pm
􀂾 Judith Chrysler
􀂾 Richard Clair
􀂾 Mark Collins
􀂾 Jezz Crosby
􀂾 Francoise Godet
􀂾 Paul Hanna
􀂾 John Krisinger
􀂾 Alexander Lautensach
􀂾 Alan Lehmann
􀂾 Larisa Tarwick
􀂾 Jane Treweeke
􀂾 Brenda V. Wesley
Terrace, 9 May 2012 9:00am – 12:00pm
􀂾 Randall Rodger
􀂾 Robert Hart
􀂾 Andre Jean Carrel
􀂾 Donald J. Bruce
􀂾 Betty Geier
􀂾 Paul Geier
􀂾 Nada Last
􀂾 Troy Peters
􀂾 Cheri Reidy
􀂾 Shekina Smart
􀂾 Colette Stewart
Terrace, 9 May 2012 1:00pm – 5:30pm
􀂾 David Duddy
􀂾 Walter R. Fricke
􀂾 Malcolm Graham
􀂾 Sam Harling
􀂾 Noel Reidy
􀂾 Mia Reimers
􀂾 Amy Spencer
Transcripts are available (see link on right), plus you can listen in. Bravo to all of you who have signed up and don't forget - you can still make a written presentation.
Order of Appearances for Oral Statements
Terrace, 7 May 2012 7:00pm – 9:00pm
􀂾 Ken Beddie
􀂾 Patrick Butler
􀂾 Christopher Gee
􀂾 Inke Giannelia
􀂾 Aaron J. GreyCloud
􀂾 Anne Hill
􀂾 Greer Kaiser
􀂾 Jupiter MacDonald
􀂾 Roderick Bruce Meredith
􀂾 Terry Walker
Terrace, 8 May 2012 9:00am – 12:00pm
􀂾 Robin Austin
􀂾 Matthew Beedle
􀂾 Frances Birdsell
􀂾 Rob Brown
􀂾 Amanita Coosemans
􀂾 Jim Culp
􀂾 Ian Gordon
􀂾 Bessie Haizimsqu
􀂾 John How
􀂾 John Jensen
􀂾 Mikael Jensen
􀂾 Brian Kean
􀂾 Amy Klepetar
􀂾 Lori Merrill
􀂾 Andrena Moore
􀂾 Dustin Quezada
􀂾 Laszlo Ratkai
􀂾 Sheree Ronasen
􀂾 Roberta (Boby) Wagner
􀂾 Allen Wootton
Terrace, 8 May 2012 1:00pm – 5:30pm
􀂾 Judith Chrysler
􀂾 Richard Clair
􀂾 Mark Collins
􀂾 Jezz Crosby
􀂾 Francoise Godet
􀂾 Paul Hanna
􀂾 John Krisinger
􀂾 Alexander Lautensach
􀂾 Alan Lehmann
􀂾 Larisa Tarwick
􀂾 Jane Treweeke
􀂾 Brenda V. Wesley
Terrace, 9 May 2012 9:00am – 12:00pm
􀂾 Randall Rodger
􀂾 Robert Hart
􀂾 Andre Jean Carrel
􀂾 Donald J. Bruce
􀂾 Betty Geier
􀂾 Paul Geier
􀂾 Nada Last
􀂾 Troy Peters
􀂾 Cheri Reidy
􀂾 Shekina Smart
􀂾 Colette Stewart
Terrace, 9 May 2012 1:00pm – 5:30pm
􀂾 David Duddy
􀂾 Walter R. Fricke
􀂾 Malcolm Graham
􀂾 Sam Harling
􀂾 Noel Reidy
􀂾 Mia Reimers
􀂾 Amy Spencer
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Lynnda McDougall - This pipeline will be stopped!
Good morning. Welcome back to Smithers.
My name is Lynnda McDougall. I currently work at the Smithers Public
Library, but since I moved to the Bulkley Valley in 1971
I've been a substitute high school teacher,
a bookkeeper and a business owner. I spent 20 years of my career in
resource-based industries, through both boom and bust
times: first in forestry as a tree-planter, slasher/bucker and a stump to dump logging
contractor, then in mining exploration as an office manager/bookkeeper for a diamond
drilling firm. For 8 years, I worked
with First Nations at the Dze L k'ant Friendship Centre.
Throughout this length of time, and breadth of experience, I have never
encountered an issue that has united and galvanized the
people of the Pacific Northwest like the threat posed
to our livelihood and our very way of life by the Enbridge Northern
Gateway Pipeline.
I am not a scientist, but you will be
hearing from many of them, detailing the atrocious assault on our watersheds that a pipeline
rupture, or worse yet, an oil tanker spill would deliver.
I am not a scientist, but I am a mother and
grandmother and a 41 year resident of this wonderful region and when I look at the map
of the pipeline route , memories come flooding back – memories of activities and
places I had assumed I would share with my grandchildren, now under threat of
degradation and extinction: camping,
boating and trout fishing at Owen Lake – spill into the
Morice? GONE! Homesteading on the banks of the Bulkley River at Quick and Telkwa,
drawing drinking water in buckets from the river, summer and winter; swimming, tubing, rafting from Walcott to
Quick – NOT IN
BITUMEN POLLUTED WATER! Swimming lessons at Round Lake with my
daughter NOT A CHANCE! A family wedding on the beach at Grey Bay on
Haida Gwai? Black tar balls don't enhance white bridal gowns
and deformed, toxic seafood doesn't provide a delicious wedding dinner.
I am not an expert, but I do recall a
sudden storm in November of 1978 when hurricane force winds blew, and over 10 inches of
rain fell on Terrace and area in 2 days.
The resulting floods and mudslides devastated the entire NW: 44 washouts on HWY 16 between
Hazelton and Terrace alone, bridges gone; CN rail tracks, including a
train with 2 crew members from Smithers, swept
into the Skeena River; over 6000 acres
of timber blown down in the Chapman Lake area
alone and the PNG natural gas line ruptured in the Telkwa Pass cutting
off the primary heating source to Terrace, Kitimat and Prince Rupert.
This incident is relevant today because it
highlights the difficulties in trying to repair infrastructure in rugged terrain, in poor
weather and with few transportation options. From Smithers to the west coast, we have
ONE road and ONE rail line. When these are impassable or compromised, the only
alternative is aircraft. Mountain flying
is hazardous at the best of times and
inclement weather simply makes it impossible.
In 1978 PNG repair crews were delayed,
first because of weather, and then by conditions as described by PNG's sales & service
manager of the Terrace district, John Low, in a news story:
“Unless the service is restored Wednesday, the area will find
itself without a major source of home heating. Low said the major break in the line occurs
about 26 miles upriver from Copper River Bridge on Highway 16. Twelve men - as
much as the site can hold - have been flown in by helicopter, and they face the task of
building a four inch bypass line 200 feet up a 70 degree slope, across 1000 to 1500
feet on top of the ridge, and back down the slope. Machinery has no access to the area, and
Low said the men are
doing all the work by hand. Two welding machines are the only
equipment being used on the site.”
It took more than a week to restore natural gas service to tens of
thousands of people,and a full two years to rebuild the roads, bridges and rails to
the previous state.
These are the conditions facing anyone trying to repair an oil
pipeline leak, and then it won't be natural gas dissipating into the air, but heavy, toxic
bitumen poisoning our waterways, killing our fish and destroying our environment.
We Northerners are a sceptical lot.
We have seen the results of projects built
by those who don't live here or understand the realities of our climate and
geography: the beautiful buildings designed
by southern architects that are cold and draughty and leak, the mega projects that
flood our farmland and dislocate our First Nations.
We don't believe Enbridge's empty promises
and smooth assurances – we've talked to the people affected by Enbridge's 2010
spill along the Kalamazoo River in Michigan and heard about the slow initial
response, subsequent denial of compensation, the reprehensible treatment of
claimants and the continued ruination of sections of the river.
We know that under Canadian law, the total
liability to Enbridge for an oil tanker spill is a paltry $40 million – the BC
taxpayer will be paying the rest of the billions required.
We don't believe the Harper government's
argument that this project is in the national interest- at least not OUR
nation. China will make out very nicely!
Greedy Oil producers, many of them foreign owned and controlled, will reap
record profits to be shipped offshore along with the bitumen and Canadian
jobs.
The Harper government would have us believe
we need the revenue generated by Northern Gateway to pay for our social
programs, but we know that eliminating the billions of dollars in taxpayer
subsidies to already profitable oil companies would provide that funding.
We are astonished anew, each day, as the
Harper Government announces proposed changes to laws that will strip us of our
environmental protection and regulatory review processes, including that of this very
panel. We urge, no we implore you, as
the people of conscience we hope you to be, to join
the people of Northern BC in condemning this project.
I am a Northerner, by choice and by
temperament. Northerners can be fiercely proud, independent, resilient, responsible, rowdy
and resourceful. We have our differences
and divisions, but in the face of a common and
pervasive threat we will work together to defeat this project. We love this country, it is our home, and we
will protect it. We will become the radicals the Harper government
accuses us of being: radically informed and radically involved. WE WILL
STOP THIS PIPELINE!!
Thursday, April 26, 2012
Kate Brooks - my children's questions
Good Morning. Thank you for this opportunity to speak.
The dinner table conversation at my house has been challenging
in the last months as we have studied the proposed Gateway Pipeline Project and
tried to figure out what it would mean to us to have a pipeline constructed so
close to where we live.
My children are 13 and 10 and as a family my husband and I spent
a lot of time with them reading articles in the press, following blogs, and
watching videos and dvd’s on the proposal. We also spent time at the Enbridge
website since much of the press has been pretty unfavourable.
As the statistics and reports added up….over 600 pipeline
leaks in the past years with a particularly bad one in the Kalamazoo river in Michigan…
my children’s questions began to pile up too…questions and statements for which
we as parents had no answer…
“Most of the pipeline leaks are old pipes, Mom, so are they
going to keep putting in new pipes on this pipeline, or will these ones get old
and leak too?”
“Mom, the Queen of the North ferry hit a rock while making
a simple turn and it sank and is still leaking oil. If the queen of the north
made a mistake, a supertanker can make one too.”
“Yeah Dad, I watched Enbridge’s video on all the safety features
they have in place but how much will that help? I bet BP and EXXON promised
there would be no accidents when they set out their proposals and look what
happened. “
“ But Mom, the Kalamazoo river cleanup is a mess. When the
engineer at the Enbridge website says he doesn’t think there is going to be a problem,
I think he is wrong. I don’t believe him.”
“So Dad, the bears need the salmon, and the trees need the
bears eating the salmon, so what happens if a spill destroys the salmon? People
are not the only ones with needs in the world, you know.”
“A leak is just one of the problems Mom…what about the
construction? Won’t it have hazards too? What about avalanches and earthquakes?
Won’t it create a big mess?
“Dad, if I was in charge, I wouldn’t let this pipeline be
built.”
“Mom, why are
they sending the oil to China? We know there is going to be an oil crisis…I
think they should save the oil for ME.”
My children are blessed to live surrounded by wild space. There
is always something to be aware of here: The oolican are running, the salmon
are running, the cranes are moving north, the geese are moving south, the loons
are back, there is fresh bear poop on the path to the wild berry patch, the
coyotes woke me up---they were so loud I thought they were in the driveway, the
moose are in the driveway between us and the car and we need to get to
town.
They appreciate the beauty and wildness here, the
spaciousness, and the complexity, even while complaining all the way up the
trail to the breath- taking view.
But they are now beginning to think that the only way to
protect a place is to not let anyone in because as my 13 year old wrote in his
school report--“The road to an oil spill is paved with any kind of intentions,
good or bad, and while good intentions will certainly prevent a spill for
awhile, it won’t forever. How would we feel if we were almost any animal on the
pipeline route when a spill happened?….Do we really want the BC coast to become
known as the Land of the Black water? Why is this happening?….To make money may
be the clear answer, but our ecosystem is one of the most rare and precious on
earth. We’re already harming it with fish farms and over fishing….Is money the
only thing we need in the world? Do we need nothing to be proud of and
protect?”
It became clear after reading this and listening to their
discussions with us that the important issue for my children is to protect a
landscape and home they love and take pride in.The important issue for me is
safety I want my kids and family to be safe and healthy and one of the things I
need for that is a clean environment.
We were drawn to looking at the safety record of Enbridge
because my kids want to protect the environment for themselves and all
creatures. I want them to be safe and healthy and in the end it really amounts
to the same thing.
Perhaps because of their naivety and innocence, they see what
so many cannot-- that money is not what truly sustains us….Wild land with wild
creatures, clean air, soil and water and community….these are what truly keeps
us alive. These are what feed us. No amount of money will ever clean up a
disaster….that has been shown the world over. Despite the millions of dollars
companies keep in the bank for that ‘just in case’ scenario…it never covers the
true cost. Never. It takes lifetimes for the earth to heal.
Part of my reason for speaking today was to ask for your
help in protecting a place that is worth protecting. It’s a healthy place and
the risks of this project seem too great. The other reason is to show my
children the importance of standing up, whether nervous or not ( and I am
incredibly nervous), to ask for that help. You, as a panel and as individuals,
have a huge responsibility, and opportunity and that is the power to weigh all
the arguments.
I ask you to please listen to the wildness of this land,
and everything and everyone that lives and thrives on it; Please go for a walk
here and look at the big picture…. Please weigh our concerns in at least equal
measure, if not more, to profit.
If we could, we’d like to pose one question. ”If Enbridge
was told that the pipeline would be closed forever if there was even one leak,
what would they do differently with their planning?"
Right now, we as a family have no confidence that Enbridge
would be able to provide an acceptable answer, and until they can we ask you to
please say No to the Enbridge pipeline proposal.
Thank you.
Paul Glover - landslides
Oral presentation to NEB Joint Review Panel
April 24, 2012
Welcome Sheila, Hans, and Ken.
Thank you for coming here to hear us. We appreciate the opportunity to
take part in the review process.
I understand that you’d rather not hear things that you’ve already
heard from other presenters, so I will try to tell you some things you haven’t
heard yet.
My name is Paul Glover. I am 57
years old. I’ve lived in the Bulkley
Valley for 37 years, and have raised my three daughters here. I plan to spend the rest of my life
here. I chose this area for its wild
landscapes, its intact ecosystems, and clean water. I have spent a lot of time in the mountains,
forests, and along the streams and rivers throughout this region. I greatly value that I can safely drink from
any mountain stream…and I do.
I know you’ve heard a lot about the instability of the
land along the proposed pipeline’s route.
You’ve surely heard of the dozens of incidents where landslides in this
region have cut powerlines, closed roads, blocked rivers, taken out railways
(even pushing a freight train into the Skeena in 1978),…and severed
pipelines.
You know that we already have some pipelines in this
area, that carry natural gas to the communities and industries across the
region. And you’re no doubt aware that, since the time they were built in the
late 1960s, these pipelines have fairly routinely been ruptured by landslides. These include incidents where gas was cut off
to communities for days at a time.
You have probably heard that in late November, 2003,
the natural gas pipeline to Prince Rupert was washed out by a mudslide. But I doubt that you’re familiar with the comments
that Attorney General Rich Coleman delivered in the BC provincial legislature
three days after the slide.
This is what he said:
“The
landslide actually took place on Friday. It was about a thousand feet across —
about 350 metres. It took out a natural gas pipeline. This is an event that
takes place in this particular area of British Columbia about once every two to
three years. There's a lot of unstable ground there, and it does cause some
difficulties. The gas line was taken out.
“Over the
weekend we were unable to actually get in there to repair the line, because the
unstable ground was still there, and the weather was too severe for people to
get in there. They are working on it now. They expect to try and get in there
and finish this to get the gas line operating in the next three to five days.”
(From Hansard, Debates of the
Legislative Assembly, MONDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2003, Afternoon Sitting, Volume
19, Number 5)
It turned out that Prince Rupert was actually without
natural gas for 10 days. That’s how
difficult it can be to get in and fix a pipeline.
When the gas pipeline was being planned, if someone
had said (as someone surely must have), “I am concerned that your gas pipeline
will be hit by a landslide and break,” do you think that Pacific Northern Gas
would have replied, “Well, yes, that might happen—there ARE a lot of landslides
around there.”?
NO, of course they would not say that. Any company in that position will assert that
the very latest and best technology is being used; that thorough risk assessments have been
done; that the route has been carefully
chosen; that they can deal with any
problems; that they care about the
environment more than anything else…and so on.
They might even say, “We have lots of pipelines in Alberta
and Saskatchewan, and they are NEVER hit by landslides!”
A company does what it needs to to meet its
objectives—which are, primarily, to make profits. I have no doubt that this is Enbridge’s
primary objective, too. And I believe
that Enbridge is overlooking the obvious risks of operating in this terrain,
blinded as it is by the pot of gold it sees waiting at the end of the rainbow,
in Kitimat.
For this reason, I am not comforted by Enbridge’s
reassurances of how its modern technology will make its pipeline safe through
some of the most unstable terrain on earth.
You panel members might know Don Thompson, past
president of the Oil Sands Producers Group.
You probably don’t know, though, that he was scheduled to speak to the
Smithers Chamber of Commerce on Oct. 21 last fall about the benefits of
tar-sands oil production. We could
expect that he would also have put in a few good words for the Northern Gateway
pipeline. But we actually don’t know
what he would have said because he didn’t get to make his presentation. He had to drive from Terrace to Smithers that
morning, and the highway was blocked by a landslide.
This landslide was cleaned up within a couple days,
but it came down the same path as a much larger one had in 2007, blocking the highway
for days and burying two people in their vehicle, killing them. If you have driven that stretch of road as
you carry out your work during this review process, you will have passed the
large pile of stones at the side of the road that is their memorial cairn.
There is no warning that one of these slides is about
to occur, except that precipitation is often a factor—something we have lots of
in the Coast Mountains. And almost all climate models predict increasingly warmer and wetter weather for this
area: More landslides can be expected.
Others have already brought up Enbridge’s pipeline
spill into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River, in the context of Enbridge’s record of
804 pipeline spills between 1999 and 2010.
“Most of them very small!” Enbridge hastens to clarify.
But not the Kalamazoo spill, that the EPA estimates
leaked more than a million gallons of Alberta crude into the river.
But you already know this. The point I want to make is that the spill occurred in
flat country, easy to access, with many resources nearby to draw from. Yet it has still proved to be much harder to
clean up than Enbridge or the EPA anticipated. By the time it is finally done to the
satisfaction of the EPA, work will have been ongoing for more than two years
straight.
EPA on-scene coordinator Ralph Dollhopf says that Enbridge has
struggled to locate all of the oil.
"Every time we go back to look, we find more," he is quoted as
saying. "The river is causing the oil we are targeting to always
move."
Please consider, Ken, Hans and Sheila, that our waterways are quite different than the easily navigable
Kalamazoo. If the river there is moving the oil around, imagine
what our whitewater streams and rivers would do with it.
And what else do I take from this? That Enbridge is quick to say how prepared
they are in case there is a spill; how
expert they are at cleaning one up. But
really, it’s clear they don’t have much of a handle on what’s involved. No one does.
It’s a nearly impossible task. If
oil gets into our rivers, it will be there for a long time.
And finally, you have certainly heard about the Enbridge pipeline
outside Chicago that was ruptured, and burst into flames, when it was struck by
a force of nature that is perhaps even more unpredictable than landslides: that is, young men in cars. In this case they were drag-racing on a
closed road. Most people don’t realize that
this pipeline is buried for most of its length except for a 30 or 40-foot
stretch that is above-ground. And this
is the part that happened to be hit.
What are the chances of that???
Quite slim, certainly. Do you think this possibility ever crossed
anyone’s mind during the risk assessment? It is very difficult to factor unpredictable
human actions into these assessments, and yet it is often just such actions
that cause problems.
My point here is that I take no comfort in a green-light risk
assessment regarding oil pipeline infrastructure in an environment that WE KNOW
is unpredictable and unstable. We CAN confidently
predict that there will be floods and landslides. There may
be earthquakes. What else could possibly
occur that we cannot even imagine as we contemplate this project from our homes
and offices, our coffee shops and our community halls, our riverbanks and our
ocean beaches?
Thank you.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Carlie Kearns - Houston Tsunamis
Good
morning. I’m Carlie Kearns.
I
moved to Houston with my husband in August 1974.
Our
first outdoor adventures here were fishing trips along the Morice River. It is an
amazingly beautiful, pristine, and powerful river!
We’ve
camped, canoed, boated, and fished most of the river from the Morice West
Bridge to Barrett Station Bridge. We’ve caught Chinook, Pink, and Coho Salmon;
Rainbow Trout, Steelhead, and Dolly Varden. We’ve seen abundant wildlife and
birds along the river and picked berries and mushrooms nearby. It is idyllic! More
people every year access this area for the fishing and the wilderness
experience - locals as well as people from across Canada, the U.S., Asia, and
Europe.
This
prime fish & animal habitat is downstream from where the proposed oil
pipeline would parallel, then cross, the Morice River and parallel the Gosnel.
In
the spring, when the Morice becomes a raging brown torrent, our explorations
eventually took us to Babine Lake and Rainbow Alley – a world-renowned
fly-fishing paradise. In the spring and summer fishermen congregate in Rainbow
Alley and Nilkitkwa Lake to fish for rainbow trout. As you know, this area is also at risk -- 80%
of the Babine rainbow trout spawn in the Sutherland River downstream from the
proposed pipeline crossing of that river.
We’ve
also enjoyed fishing and boating in the Douglas Channel where I’ve seen whales,
halibut, crab, rock cod, salmon, starfish, multitudes of birds, and vast beds
of kelp.
The
cycles of nature sustained by the rivers, lakes, and ocean are immense – waterways
truly are the life blood of this province.
I
am horrified by the thought of an oil pipeline through this area and oil super tankers
traversing within the confines of the Douglas Channel.
Oil spills
are inevitable.
Last June I
wrote a letter to the Houston Today newspaper expressing my concerns about the
risk of spills. The following week Mr. John Carruthers, President of Northern
Gateway Pipelines, responded by stating in his letter to the editor: “Enbridge delivers almost a billion barrels
of hydrocarbons a year through its pipeline system with a safety record of
99.99 percent”.
So they do
NOT safely deliver almost 100,000 barrels per year at their current volumes?
(1,000,000,000 x .01)
The planned
pipeline would carry an average of 525,000 barrels of bitumen per day. Using
Mr. Carruthers’ statistics we could then expect total spills or leaks of almost
100,000 barrels somewhere along this line within 6 years. Hopefully his
statistics are wrong and his letter was meant to be re-assuring – perhaps not -
but at least he’s given us fair warning.
I am aware of
two Enbridge crude oil spills in 2011:
28,000 barrels northeast of Peace River Alberta in May and 1,500 barrels
from the Norman Wells line in the Northwest Territories in June.
There was
also an Exxon Mobile rupture of a 12” pipe under the Yellowstone River spilling
1,000 barrels that resulted in the evacuation of residents, closure of water
intakes, and the fouling of the river banks for almost 50 miles downstream.
The Norman
Wells pipeline spill was discovered by Dene hunters – a pin-hole leak
apparently – that wasn’t noticed by the Enbridge up-to-date monitoring
technology. Most of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline traverses a remote
wilderness and is under ice and snow for 4 months of the year. How much damage would
a pine-hole leak or leaks cause along this line and how far would the oil travel
before it was discovered?
At
the Hearings here in January, Elsie Tiljoe spoke of her experience of being
shaken out of bed when she was a child. She lived in the Houston area. That
could have been the magnitude 8.1 earthquake centered in Haida Gwaii in 1949.
I
don’t know if tremors from the 9.2 magnitude March 1964 Alaska earthquake were
felt in Houston but tsunamis from that quake caused damage in B.C., Oregon,
& California.
The
magnitude 7.9 earthquake in Alaska in November 2002 was also felt in the
Houston area. An article written by Grace Hols and published in Houston Today states:
“Workers at the Equity mine site noticed a
strange thing in the Main Zone pit the morning of Monday, November 4. A boat that is normally tied up about a foot
out of the water was adrift among slabs of ice in the pit. The last time they
had seen the pit, it was frozen right over with a layer of ice four inches
thick...You can see where a surge wave had come through and pushed the ice up,
said Mike Aziz, operations manager at the Equity site. ...”
I
have a photo of the tailings pond taken by Mike Aziz, Operations Manager, on
November 4th 2002, the day after the quake. The shoreline is
littered with slabs of ice that were washed up by the mini tsunami.
The
proposed pipeline would run within a few kilometers of Equity Mines.
The Natural
Resources Canada website states that in an earthquake “The plates can either slide past one another,
or they can collide, or they can diverge...The west coast of Canada is one of the
few areas in the world where all three of these types of plate movements take
place, resulting in significant earthquake activity.”
I
hope you verify this additional hazard.
I’d
like to remind you of the Enbridge track record for spill clean-up.
Remember
the Kalamazoo River spill of July 2010?
I
have a quote from a news release of October 6th 2011.
“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
issued a directive today requiring Enbridge to take additional steps to clean
up the July 2010 oil spill that damaged over 36 miles of the Kalamazoo River
system. The directive requires Enbridge to submit plans by Oct. 20, 2011 for
cleanup and monitoring work expected to last through 2012. Failure to comply
could result in civil penalties. The EPA directive lays out a performance-based
framework for assessing and recovering submerged oil in the river and cleaning
up oil-contaminated river banks.”
The
Kalamazoo river spill happened in July 2010. The US Environmental Protection
Agency found it necessary to give Enbridge a clean-up directive over a year
later and they expect the clean up to carry on throughout 2012 – 2 ½ years from the time of the rupture.
Imagine
how much irreparable damage has been done by this spill. Despite their
up-to-date monitoring technology and clean-up strategies, 36 miles of the
Kalamazoo River is damaged, eco-systems destroyed.
I
hope you have data about the damage, costs, and clean-up efforts for the
Kalamazoo, the Peace River and the Norman Wells spills.
I
feel sickened that the Enbridge pipeline proposal is even being considered
seriously and that it is being pushed by the Harper Government.
The
risks to the B.C. Fisheries; the First Nations territories and culture; the
tourist industry; the pristine wilderness; and the ecosystems all along the proposed
pipeline route, the Douglas Channel, and the Pacific coastline, are not worth any
amount of financial gain.
The
risks are clear. The benefits are not.
Thank
you for listening to the local people all along the line who are speaking out
against this project. This is our home.
Sources:
Letter from John Carruthers in Houston
Today (online) June 2011
Norman Wells spill: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/story/2011/06/07/nwt-enbridge-pipeline-spill.html
Montana oil spill fouls
Yellowstone River The
Associated Press (online)
Peace Spill: cbc.ca/news
(online)
Saved Letter about Kalamazoo and online
EPA press release
Houston Today newspaper article November
2002 (Houston Public Library)
Natural Resources Canada website (online)
(earthquakes data)
Photo of Equity Tailings Pond Taken by
Mike Aziz Nov. 4/2002 (included & saved)
Jim Pojar - Bearing Witness
Jim Pojar
April 2012
ENBRIDGE PRESENTATION
·
I have lived in Bulkley Valley since 1978
·
terrestrial ecologist; 25 years with BC Forest
Service
·
lots of fieldwork throughout nwBC, from Prince George
to Haida Gwaii, from Atlin to Bella Coola, usually in the company of earth
scientists
·
over the years have noticed that physical
scientists (soil scientists, geologists, climatologists) & engineers from
east of Rockies initially don’t “get” mountainous BC
·
often takes them several years to re-calibrate their
working reality (in terms of topography, rapid changes over short distances,
mass movements, peak flows, extreme events, really physically active landscapes
/ hydrogeomorphological processes)
·
in light of threats to terrestrial and esp
freshwater aquatic ecosystems of wc BC, from pipeline construction and
subsequent ruptures and leaks along the line:
Recommendation: review
photos of severe erosion—of roads, culverts, bridges—caused by last summer’s
rainstorms; posted on Flickr site of BC Min. of Transportation &
Infrastructure.
·
big rainstorms with surface erosion + mass
movements = a potent combination for damage to all linear infrastructure, especially
in mountainous terrain
·
Peace Region – late June 2011; along Hwy 97 from Chetwynd to
Mackenzie; more than 25 significant blowout sites; said to be a 1-in-40 year
event, but frequency will increase as climate warms
·
Coast Mtns – after 12 cm of rain from Sept 7-8, 2011; Hwy 37,
especially the spur to Stewart; massive erosion; bridges and roadbed washed
away, streams cutting new channels
·
Heckman Pass – in July 2011; bedrock failures along Hwy 20
(road to Bella Coola) after series of rainstorms
Conservation Values of West Central BC
Terrestrial—conservation values in the mountainous portions of wc BC centre on the region’s rivers—especially the larger drainages—and productive valley bottoms, with riparian ecosystems & high fish and wildlife values.
Stepping back for a broad, continental
view, the Bulkley Rges & Kitimat Rges (coastal
or coast-interior transitional mountain ecosections roughly from Zymoetz River
to Whitesail Lake)
have some nationally & globally significant ecological attributes.
· unregulated,
lake-headed salmon rivers with clean water and high quality aquatic habitat
(intact freshwater aquatic habitats one of rarest class of ecosystems in the
world)
· +/- intact
large-mammal predator-prey systems
· continentally important
habitat & populations of g bear, Kermode bear, m goat, wolf, wolverine
· coastal temperate
rainforest (aka Great Bear Rainforest)
Marine—but the really “world class” system occurs along the Coast.
·
BC’s
globally significant north & central coast, 88,000 km2 of marine
ecosystems; archipelago-fiord & continental shelf—and fractally complex land-water interface.
·
Ecosystems
like kelp forests, seagrass meadows, fertile estuaries, 9000-yr old glass
sponge reefs, seamounts.
·
Species
including whales, porpoises, rockfish, sea otters, seabirds, herring, eulachon,
nudibranchs, octopus.
·
“Combination
of complex oceanographic conditions and seafloor characteristics … with
channels, banks, deep troughs, eddies, upwellings, estuaries, and depths from 0
to 2000 m, creates a wide range of ecological niches and in turn supports a
diverse array of species.”[1]
Cumulative
Effects
Nonetheless much of the landscape along the
proposed pipeline route has been industrialised—esp across Interior Plateau.
The natural environment has been subjected to: extensive clearcut logging w
numerous roads & stream crossings; railroad + major highway; mines & effluents;
hydroelectric transmission lines; gas pipelines; agriculture.
·
All
effects are ‘cumulative’; accumulate through time and over space; do not
represent a special class of impacts.
·
Must
assess the aggregate stresses on
environmental values.
·
Series
of small +/- minor effects can accumulate to result in a significant overall
effect (death by a thousand cuts)
·
Total
impact greater than simple sum of individual stressors. E.g., access
development >> roads and stream crossings; on unstable terrain/erodible
soils >> erosion & sedimentation; >>increased hunting &
fishing pressure
Homeland
vs Hinterland
A few years ago a senior Yukon Government
manager (Energy Mines & Resources) assured me that dealing with the oil
& gas industry was straightforward because “they’re just looking for a
bigger sandbox to play in.”
A remark dismaying but revealing:
·
“manifest
destiny” approach of the industry & its servants in government
·
cavalier
attitude to natural and human environment of w Canada: tar sands, Mackenzie
Valley, Ft. Nelson Lowland, Sacred Headwaters, Bulkley Valley—each is just
another piece of bush
·
underlying
assumption that collateral damage from O&G exploration, development, &
transport will be insignificant because it occurs in a sparsely populated
hinterland
·
distinction
between homeland & hinterland that Thomas Berger highlighted in Mackenzie
Valley pipeline hearings.
Conclusion
Because of threats to the natural
environment of west central BC—in particular to the freshwater aquatic and
marine systems—from pipeline construction and subsequent ruptures and
leaks along the line, and from oil spills and other pollution from tankers
along the coast;
Because of the
unacceptable attitude of the oil & gas industry and senior governments toward
the people who live along the proposed route;
And because of the
threats to our homeland, our quality of life, and the stability and health of our
communities;
I am strongly opposed
to this proposed pipeline.
[1] Lucas, B.S., S.
Verrin, R. Brown, eds. 2007. Ecosystem overview: Pacific North Coast Integrated
Management Area (PNCIMA). Can. Tech, Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2667: 104 p.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Congratulations to our community!
It has been the most amazing couple of days in the journey this pipeline project has precipitated. The oral presentations began in Smithers yesterday; as well as giving my own oral testimony, I heard person after person present thoughtful, intelligent, heartfelt, analytical, emotional, and moving presentations. Every person had a unique perspective; some brought in family history, biological research, new impressions, childhood memories, you name it. One presenter, an organic gardener, asked for a moment of silence in memory of the rivers we've already killed...you can listen in live at The National Energy Board Site.
Here's what I presented: I'm hoping to have more presentations in the next few days.
Here's what I presented: I'm hoping to have more presentations in the next few days.
I’m a writer and
publisher; working with words has been a part of my life as long as I can
remember. So before I go any further, I want to be clear. When asked the
question, should Enbridge’s Northern Gateway project be built, my answer is no.
Absolutely not. And if you believe in this government’s so-called economic
policy that claims building war ships, prisons, and exporting raw bitumen to
China is in the national interest, while it suppresses or vilifies the voices
of anyone who might actually have some data to refute that claim, well, I have
a bridge you might be interested in. No, not the famous one in New York, not
even that new Peace bridge just built in Calgary, no, a lovely little footbridge
that crosses Driftwood Creek beside our home. A creek our boys fished in, swam
in, skated on, and played beside from their earliest days. A creek that has watered my garden and my
creativity with its many voices, a voice that in spring, I like to imagine
speaks with the thousand tongues of winter. A creek that is in one of the
watersheds this pipeline proposes to cross.
And while you may think
water runs only one way, spend enough time beside a creek and you’ll realize
your mistake. The salmon and oolichan travelling upstream to spawn are obvious
and important examples, but every spring – and I mean that literally – we stand
on that bridge and watch two or three harlequin ducks paddling up Driftwood Creek,
often while patches of snow still line the banks – usually two males and a
female – who have travelled hundreds of km upriver from the coast to build a
nest and rear their young in the high alpine.
And every year, from
that same bridge, we see dippers managing, even when it’s forty below, to find
an opening:
A quiet seepage –
too quiet, really, to
be called a spring –
can unlock the
earth’s heat.
The ice exhales and
opens
a pool for this
dipper
bobbing on a rock.
It dives in and
finds a current
that’s warmer than
the winter air.
There’s spirit in there somewhere,
and bouncing back, the bird
it dipsy doodles
on the slippery dance floor
tapping out some bebop riff
we all wish that we could follow.
Something in the key of home.
That one small creek
and the river it flows into are all part of the watershed that my family calls
home.
And home is what I
really want to talk about. It was 1976, and I was on my way into the northwest
for a newspaper job when I passed a sign planted on a hill somewhere between
Burns and Decker lakes. Eternity, it
said. Where will you be? Well, I knew it wasn’t going to be here. After one
northern winter, I was heading back south, back to school, back to civilization.
But before that, I had
a trip to finish. Coming down Six-Mile Hill, the muffler on my car dropped to become
a rattling sparking percussive accompaniment to my precipitous descent. Instant
comeuppance for my sneer at eternity. A friendly northerner gave me wire to
bind the muffler back into place until I reached my destination. Which, like
the Enbridge pipeline, was Kitimat. I spent a few days there, and a few months
in Terrace before I moved to Smithers in 1977, where I’ve lived pretty much ever
since – always within earshot of Driftwood Creek.
So, about the sign. It
was located right about where the pipelines would cross Highway 16, the Endako
River, the CN track, and continue west across Gerow Creek (still in the Fraser
River watershed) to Maxan Creek. A height of land. Maxan Creek flows into Maxan
Lake which drains into Bulkley Lake, the headwaters of the Bulkley River and the
Skeena watershed. The pipeline would then cross Foxy and Klo and Buck creeks,
Owen Creek and Fenton Creek all on its way to the Morice that used to be called
Watsonquah. All the history in those names. All flowing into the Bulkley, the
Skeena, the Pacific, right out to where those harlequin ducks spend their
winters on an intricate coastline that defies measurement.
Just last summer we spent
a few days on Porcher Island; one day we paddled over to Oval Beach on the eastern
shore of Hecate Strait. This poem, Fractals
on Oval Beach came from that day. (Fractals are irregular shapes that can
be repeatedly subdivided into increasingly smaller copies of the whole. They
are used to model natural structures that, unlike pipelines, do not have simple
geometric shapes.)
A fat black raven stands just above the
surf line.
Another perches on a nearby log.
Something glints
as the water rolls and drops it,
stranded on the gravel.
One raven hops down and nabs the
wriggling silver streak.
He jumps back before the next wave
crashes,
a surf smelt thrashing in his beak.
He gulps, gagging as it struggles in his
throat.
We walk into the waves, looking.
And there they are. As numerous
as the shards of fractured light
slivers of fish roll and tumble in each
wave.
The other raven hops down, head
sideways.
It plucks another smelt
from the sand. Both birds eat.
Both watch and wait for more.
The sun lights their feathers
with the iridescence of oil floating on
water.
On our way here,
we paddled through a narrow opening
between two outcrops. Inside these
waters
it’s hard to tell which rocks are
islands
and which are part of something bigger. The
tides change
the answer every minute and this week
the tides are over twenty feet. Our
boats slipped through,
the hulls skimming hundreds of
anemones
and sea cucumbers, sea squirts, sun
stars, bat stars, starfish,
some dangling high above us, waiting for
the tide.
Crabs scuttled, as crabs do
and dug trenches in the sand, claws up
for battle.
All this seen in one small pause
in one small opening
in the coastline of one small island.
How long, you might ask, is the
coastline of Porcher Island?
It all depends on how carefully you
measure. The closer you get,
the longer the coast becomes. Much
longer
than you might have thought. Infinity,
in fact,
contained within this finite space.
This is not just a measurement to amuse
mathematicians.
It’s a line drawn by the daily wash of
water,
full of invisible life,
filtered to feed the anemone
and the humpback whale,
to feeds the smelts,
the herring,
the oolichan,
that feed the salmon,
that feed the silver-sided dolphins we
floated among
as they thrashed back and forth across
the bay,
over a hundred of them jumping, turning, tail
slapping the water into a chop.
To feed the wolves that pace the shore.
It’s a line that would become
an oil slick underscored by globules of
bitumen
rolling and tumbling onto the same
beaches
the surf smelts needs to spawn.
Into each kelp bed, each low tide cranny
where complexity resides.
Where our harlequins return
in late summer with their young.
There’s a new sign now that
say, Jesus Cares for You. While I’m tickled to have outlasted that sign just this
side of Burns Lake, I have come to miss its urgency, urgency we need now. It
isn’t the fabricated urgency the oil companies and their political preachers
profess from Ottawa’s pulpits. It’s the urgent voice of a river in full flood,
a swollen muddy thing that rips out cottonwoods, bridges, roads and even houses
if you’re not careful. Not to mention pipelines. I encourage all of you, as the
high snows melt, to go down to the water and listen. The water is asking us
that same question. Eternity – where
will we be?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



